Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/05/09 11:31, David Rowley wrote:
> > On 9 May 2018 at 14:29, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> >> On 2018/05/09 11:20, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >>> While looking at this code, is there any reason to not make
> >>> gen_partprune_steps static? This is only used in partprune.c for now,
> >>> so the intention is to make it available for future patches?
> Here is a patch that does that.
Pushed, thanks.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services