On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:00:36AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 4/23/18 05:54, Liudmila Mantrova wrote:
> > Reading this thread, I got an impression that everyone would benefit
> > from converting back branches to XML, but the main concern is lack of
> > resources to complete this task. Are there any other issues that affect
> > this decision? Looks like Aleksander Lakhin's offer to prepare patches
> > was missed somehow as the discussion sidetracked to other issues
>
> That proposal seemed to indicate not only converting the source code to
> XML but also the build system to XSL. The latter is out of the
> question, I think.
Why is that? I thought people building current Postgres would already
have the XML toolchain built to build older release documentation.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +