Re: Built-in connection pooling
| От | Michael Paquier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Built-in connection pooling |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20180426020908.GD18940@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Built-in connection pooling (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Built-in connection pooling
Re: Built-in connection pooling |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 03:42:31PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > The difficulty of finding them all is really the problem. If we had a > reliable way to list everything that needs to be moved into session > state, then we could try to come up with a design to do that. > Otherwise, we're just swatting issues one by one and I bet we're > missing quite a few. Hm? We already know about the reset value of a parameter in pg_settings, which points out to the value which would be used if reset in a session, even after ebeing reloaded. If you compare it with the actual setting value, wouldn't that be enough to know which parameters have been changed at session-level by an application once connecting? So you can pull out a list using such comparisons. The context a parameter is associated to can also help. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: