Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> It seems quite silly to be asking for a parallel plan and then insisting
> >> it not run in parallel.
>
> > Now that you mention it, this probably decreases coverage for the
> > choose_next_subplan_for_worker function.
>
> Yeah, loss of executor code coverage was what concerned me.
Here's a proposed patch for this.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services