Hi,
On 2018-04-07 13:45:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On 6 April 2018 at 17:22, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >> My point was that people didn't ask you to work harder on fixing the
> >> patch, but in reverting it. You can work harder on fixing things in the
> >> hope they change their minds, but again, that isn't addressing their
> >> request.
>
> > If Tom or Andres still feel that their concerns have not been
> > addressed over the last few days, I am happy to revert the patch with
> > no further discussion from me in this cycle.
>
> FWIW, I still vote to revert. Even if the patch were now perfect,
> there is not time for people to satisfy themselves of that, and
> we've got lots of other things on our plates.
Precisely.
And no, I don't think the concerns have been addressed fully.
> I'd be glad to participate in a proper review of this when v12
> opens. But right now it just seems too rushed, and I have little
> confidence in it being right.
Yea, I'd really hope this gets submitted *early* in the v12 cycle rather
than leaving it to the end. I'd even be willing to produce a prototype
of what I think should be changed in the parse-analysis & executor
stages, if necessary.
Greetings,
Andres Freund