Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Дата
Msg-id 20180407154845.qqwxa53m5lwg47u4@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2018-04-07 08:13:23 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
> > I've also attempted to fix rhinoceros's failure I remarked upon a couple
> > hours ago in
> > https://postgr.es/m/20180406210330.wmqw42wqgiicktli@alap3.anarazel.de
> 
> And this, too.  I was unsure if this was because we were missing calling
> some object access hook from the new code, or the additional pruning.

That's possible.  I did attempt to skim the code, that's where my
complain about the docs originated. There certainly isn't an
InvokeFunctionExecuteHook() present.  It's not clear to me whether
that's an issue - we don't invoke the hooks in a significant number of
places either, and as far as I can discern there's not much rule or
reason about where we invoke it.

Greetings,

Andres Freund


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pgbench - allow to store select results intovariables