Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> > FWIW I liked the idea of having this abstraction possibly do other
> > things -- for instance to vacuum brin indexes you'd like to mark index
> > tuples as "containing tuples that were removed" and eventually
> > re-summarize the range. With the current interface we cannot do that,
> > because vacuum expects brin vacuuming to ask for each heap tuple "is
> > this tid dead?" and of course we don't have a list of tids to ask for.
> > So if we can ask instead "how many dead tuples does this block contain?"
> > brin vacuuming will be much happier.
>
> I don't think either patch gives you that.
>
> The bulkdelete interface is part of the indexam and unlikely to change
> in this patch.
I'm sure you're correct. I was just saying that with the abstract
interface it is easier to implement what I suggest as a follow-on patch.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services