Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Дата
Msg-id 20180403143736.z42lxviikrf4iyxc@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Tomas Vondra wrote:

> Yes, that is a good point actually - we need to test that replication
> between PG10 and PG11 works correctly, i.e. that the protocol version is
> correctly negotiated, and features are disabled/enabled accordingly etc.

Maybe it'd be good to have a buildfarm animal to specifically test for
that?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions