On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 11:51:50AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 3/30/18 10:40, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 01:56:32AM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> >> 2018-03-09 0:10 GMT-03:00 PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>:
> >>> From testing, it seems like PostgreSQL supports the syntax "IS NOT DOCUMENT"
> >>> in addition to "IS DOCUMENT", similar to "IS NOT NULL", "IS NOT FALSE", etc,
> >>> however this does not appear to be documented, only "IS DOCUMENT" is.
> >>>
> >> It has been like that since day 1. I'm not sure why it was not
> >> documented. It already has some tests. I'll bet that was an oversight.
> >> Should we repeat the statement in another item (like the attached
> >> patch)? Another option is to add a statement in the "IS DOCUMENT"
> >> item. I'm afraid that NULL return wouldn't be clear.
> >>
> >
> > Patch applied and backpatched to Postgres 10. Thank.s
>
> Per the nearby discussion, this should probably also be backpatched further.
OK, backpatched through 9.3.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +