Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Дата
Msg-id 20180329215815.36xxakgujx4luo4m@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2018-03-29 23:52:18 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > I have added details about this in src/backend/storage/lmgr/README as
> > suggested by you.
> > 
> 
> Thanks. I think the README is a good start, but I think we also need to
> improve the comments, which is usually more detailed than the README.
> For example, it's not quite acceptable that LogicalLockTransaction and
> LogicalUnlockTransaction have about no comments, especially when it's
> meant to be public API for decoding plugins.

FWIW, for me that's ground to not accept the feature. Burdening output
plugins with this will make their development painful (because they'll
have to adapt regularly) and correctness doubful (there's nothing
checking for the lock being skipped).  Another way needs to be found.

- Andres


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Следующее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: csv format for psql