Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ildus Kurbangaliev
Тема Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries
Дата
Msg-id 20180319153839.5dd94c75@wp.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries  (Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:06:50 +0300
Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:

> 
> I beleive mmap requires completely rewrite 0003 part of the patch and
> a little changes in 0005.
> 
> > In any case, I suggest to polish the dsm-based patch, and see if we
> > can get that one into PG11.  
> 
> Yes we have more time in future commitfests if dsm-based patch won't
> be approved.
> 

Hi, I'm not sure about mmap approach, it would just bring another
problems. I like the dsm approach because it's not inventing any new
files in the database, when mmap approach will possibly require new
folder in data directory and management above bunch of new files, with
additional issues related with pg_upgrade and etc. Also in dsm approach
if someone needs to update dictionaries then he (or his package
manager) can just replace files and be done with it.

-- 
---
Ildus Kurbangaliev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrey Borodin
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Online enabling of checksums
Следующее
От: Etsuro Fujita
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables