Hi,
On 2018-03-05 17:57:51 -0300, Andre Oliveira Freitas wrote:
> Ok, on one hand glad to hear that is an artifact, on the other hand
> that means the issue is still out there...
>
> I'm not a maintainer of Freeswitch, I am an user of it. However I am
> trying to supply the maintainers with any relevant information
> regarding this issue.
>
> As you mentioned, I see the socket being modified and passed around in
> the source code. Do you think the implementation is OK? I do not know
> if that's standard practice when consuming libpq.
It's ok to pass the socket around, it'd not be ok to change whether the
socket blocks or not. I don't have the time to review the freeswitch
code to see whether it does so.
- Andres