On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 08:58:18AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 3/2/18 03:23, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> That's a better idea. I have reworked that in 0001. What do you think?
>> This has the same effect as diag(), which shows information directly to
>> the screen, and that's the behavior I was looking for.
>
> I ended up using plan skip_all, which seems to be intended for this
> purpose, according to the documentation.
Yes, that's what I got as well first but...
>> I have concluded about using the most simple name: PG_TEST_EXTRA. A
>> documentation attempt is added as well. This is unfortunately close to
>> EXTRA_TESTS. It would be tempting to directly reuse EXTRA_TESTS as
>> well, however this is used only for the core regression tests now, so a
>> separated variable seems adapted to me.
>
> Committed. Very nice.
Thanks for the commit, Peter, PG_TEST_EXTRA is already set is my
environment.
--
Michael