Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().
| От | Arthur Zakirov |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20180217090239.GA14632@arthur.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:23:53PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> * On line 52 there is a removed empty line, without any other changes around
Agree, it is unnecessary change. There was the macro there before.
> * On line 177 there is a new commented out line of code. I assume it's not
> an
> explanation or something and we don't need it, am I right?
It explains a node type we deal with. But maybe it is not very useful,
so I removed it.
> And Oracle complains about this:
>
> SELECT to_timestamp('2000 + JUN', ' /') FROM dual
> ORA-01830: date format picture ends before converting entire input string
>
> SELECT to_timestamp('2000 + JUN', ' ') FROM dual
> ORA-01830: date format picture ends before converting entire input string
>
> It's sort of corner case, but anyway maybe you would be interested to handle
> it.
I think it could be fixed by another patch. But I'm not sure that it
will be accepted as well as this patch :).
--
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: