Re: Let's remove DSM_INPL_NONE.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: Let's remove DSM_INPL_NONE.
Дата
Msg-id 20180215180039.qbgjyfp7fc627y3e@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Let's remove DSM_INPL_NONE.  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: Let's remove DSM_INPL_NONE.
Re: Let's remove DSM_INPL_NONE.
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2018-02-15 19:58:57 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> As in the other threads[1][2], we have had several good reasons
> to remove DSM_IMPL_NONE in PG11. The attached patch doesn that.
> 
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+Tgmoa0e23YC3SCwB85Yf5oUTRyirV=Sq_rXYxaXABLdPpjoA@mail.gmail.com
> 
> [2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180214.103858.02713585.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp

Hm, I'm not quite convinced by this. Seems to make testing a bunch of
codepaths harder.  I think it's fine to say that pg doesn't work
correctly with them disabled though.

- Andres


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.1
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: spin.c includes pg_sema.h even if unnecessary