On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 02:21:38PM +0100, Thomas Trepl wrote:
> according to changlelog of glibc-2.27 they introduced a new function
> named "copy_file_range".
Yes, some buildfarm machines caught that already. Here is the commit
fixing it, which will be available in next week's round of minor
releases:
commit: 3e68686e2c55799234ecd020bd1621f913d65475
author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 12:40:32 -0800
Rename pg_rewind's copy_file_range() to avoid conflict with new linux syscall.
Upcoming versions of glibc will contain copy_file_range(2), a wrapper
around a new linux syscall for in-kernel copying of data ranges. This
conflicts with pg_rewinds function of the same name.
Therefore rename pg_rewinds version. As our version isn't a generic
copying facility we decided to choose a rewind specific function name.
Per buildfarm animal caiman and subsequent discussion with Tom Lane.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/20180103033425.w7jkljth3e26sduc@alap3.anarazel.de
https://postgr.es/m/31122.1514951044@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch: 9.5-, where pg_rewind was introduced
This report reminds me that I haven't patched yet the version of
pg_rewind for REL9_4_STABLE and REL9_3_STABLE that I maintain for
VMware. Will do that now..
--
Michael