Re: Package version in PG_VERSION and version()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christoph Berg
Тема Re: Package version in PG_VERSION and version()
Дата
Msg-id 20180117144751.GC23525@msg.credativ.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Package version in PG_VERSION and version()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Package version in PG_VERSION and version()
Список pgsql-hackers
Re: Tom Lane 2018-01-17 <15537.1516200157@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> IMO there's not really any evidence that we need an additional mechanism
> in this space.  I don't see any way to get that evidence unless some
> packager tries to use the existing mechanism and hits insurmountable
> problems.

The problem is that the problems will likely not be in my/our/Debian's
realm, but in anything that uses our packages downstream. E.g. the
"official" Docker images are using our packages. There is no way to
test that external stuff without actually publishing the packages for
production consumption.

Christoph
-- 
Senior Berater, Tel.: +49 2166 9901 187
credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080, USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209
Trompeterallee 108, 41189 Mönchengladbach
Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Jörg Folz, Sascha Heuer
pgp fingerprint: 5C48 FE61 57F4 9179 5970  87C6 4C5A 6BAB 12D2 A7AE


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Package version in PG_VERSION and version()
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit