On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:44:00PM -0800, Neto pr wrote:
> Dear all
>
> Someone help me analyze the two execution plans below (Explain ANALYZE
> used), is the query 9 of TPC-H benchmark [1].
>
> I'm using a server HP Intel Xeon 2.8GHz/4-core - Memory 8GB HDD SAS 320GB
> 15 Krpm AND SSD Sansung EVO 500GB.
>
> I think maybe the execution plan is using more write operations, and so the
> HDD SAS 15Krpm has been faster.
The query plan is all garbled by mail , could you resend? Or post a link from
https://explain.depesz.com/
To see if the query is causing many writes (due to dirty pages, sorts, etc),
run with explain(analyze,buffers)
But from what I could tell, your problems are here:
-> Parallel Seq Scan on lineitem (cost=0.00..5861332.93 rows=100005093 width=41) (actual TIME=3.494..842667.110
rows=80004097loops=3)
vs
-> Parallel Seq Scan on lineitem (cost=0.00..5861333.40 rows=100005140 width=41) (actual TIME=41.805..224438.909
rows=80004097loops=3)
-> Seq Scan on partsupp (cost=0.00..1052983.08 rows=31999708 width=22) (actual TIME=0.033..228828.149 rows=32000000
loops=3)
vs
-> Seq Scan on partsupp (cost=0.00..1052934.38 rows=31994838 width=22) (actual TIME=0.037..37865.003 rows=32000000
loops=3)
Can you reproduce the speed difference using dd ?
time sudo dd if=/dev/sdX of=/dev/null bs=1M count=32K skip=$((128*$RANDOM/32)) # set bs to optimal_io_size
Or: bonnie++ -f -n0
What OS/kernel are you using? LVM? filesystem? I/O scheduler? partitions?
readahead? blockdev --getra
If you're running under linux, maybe you can just send the output of:
for a in /sys/block/sdX/queue/*; do echo "$a `cat $a`"; done
or: tail
/sys/block/sdX/queue/{minimum_io_size,optimal_io_size,read_ahead_kb,scheduler,rotational,max_sectors_kb,logical_block_size,physical_block_size}
Justin