On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 06:26:21PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:43:00AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 9:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 04:58:39PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >> Pg_upgrade is able to run in --check mode when the old server is still
> > >> running. Unfortunately, all supported versions of pg_upgrade generate
> > >> an incorrect (but harmless) "failure" message when doing this:
> > >
> > > Based on recent discussions, I am thinking we would just fix this in PG
> > > 10 and HEAD and leave the harmless error message in the other branches,
> > > right?
> >
> > Hmm, not sure why you say that. If the message is buggy and the fix
> > isn't too risky, might as well fix it all the way back.
>
> OK, I will do that then. The message is harmless, but confusing, so I
> would like to fix it, but it requires changing the API of two functions.
> I will see how cleanly it applies back to 9.3 and act accordingly.
I ended up just doing HEAD and PG10. When you change a function API,
you have to change every call site, and that can cause the patch to be
large and make backpatching too far difficult, which was the case for
this patch.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +