Re: BUGFIX: standby disconnect can corrupt serialized reorder buffers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: BUGFIX: standby disconnect can corrupt serialized reorder buffers
Дата
Msg-id 20180105192829.wiwqjv2nmrryoco3@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на BUGFIX: standby disconnect can corrupt serialized reorder buffers  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: BUGFIX: standby disconnect can corrupt serialized reorder buffers
Список pgsql-hackers
I think this should use ReadDirExtended with an elevel less than ERROR,
and do nothing.

Why have strcmp(.) and strcmp(..)?  These are going to be skipped by the
comparison to "xid" prefix anyway.  Looks like strcmp processing power waste.

Please don't use bare sprintf() -- upgrade to snprintf.

With this coding, if I put a root-owned file "xidfoo" in a replslot
directory, it will PANIC the server.  Is that okay?  Why not read the
file name with sscanf(), since we know the precise format it has?  Then
we don't need to bother with random crap left around.  Maybe a good time
to put the "xid-%u-lsn-%X-%X.snap" literal in a macro?   I guess the
rationale is that if you let random people put "xidfoo" files in your
replication slot dirs, you deserve a PANIC anyway, but I'm not sure.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places
Следующее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage