Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support
| От | Michael Paquier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20180103095912.GA680@paquier.xyz обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 10:54:29PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I think the solution is that we need to require that all SSL server-side > implementations support all channel binding types. That could be a stop for Windows and macos SSL implementations then. I would think that we would benefit by being softer here, say with the following guidelines: - Have the server publish the -PLUS mechanism only if an SSL implementation supports tls-unique. - The RFC makes tls-unique mandatory, so requiring only tls-unique to be present looks like a good default for me. It is true that JDBC makes this whole thing harder, tls-server-end-point patch has been done mainly for them. Even for OpenSSL, I had to dig within their code tree to figure out the APIs to use to get the hash algorithm. I would not be surprised that the same investigation is necessary for gnutls. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: