On 2017-12-12 14:16:59 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > I agree that it's more reliable - I hope there's no meaningful safety
> > difference. I think you overestimate users a bit however - far from
> > most of them are going to be able to extract a very long log entry from
> > a busy log file. There's no generally available easy way to copy a few
> > pages of text from a logfile that's a few gigabytes large...
>
> Well, a lot of users will send us the whole logfile rather than just
> the relevant bits, but that doesn't bother me.
That doesn't really work on some busy servers, and also often in cases
where the log potentially contains sensitive (e.g. HIPPA) data.
I think a function returning the dump would be great, a function "just"
dumping to the server log still pretty good.
Greetings,
Andres Freund