Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 13 November 2017 at 12:55, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> > Somehow I managed to include an unrelated patch as attachment.  Here's
> > another attempt (on which I also lightly touched ddl.sgml with relevant
> > changes).
> 
> Looks good. Some minor comments below.
> 
> 0001- Simplify
> Seems useful as separate step; agree with everything, no further comments

Thanks, pushed.

> Why uint16? Why not just uint?

*Shrug*.  16 bits seem plenty enough.  I changed it to bits16, which we
use in other places for bitmasks.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services