Re: [PERFORM] overestimate on empty table

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Justin Pryzby
Тема Re: [PERFORM] overestimate on empty table
Дата
Msg-id 20171111171945.GA2167@telsasoft.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PERFORM] overestimate on empty table  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [PERFORM] overestimate on empty table  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 04:19:41PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> writes:
> > (or, the opposite of the more common problem)

> > As the queued_alters table is typically empty (and autoanalyzed with
> > relpages=0), I see "why":
> 
> > ./src/backend/optimizer/util/plancat.c
> > |                        if (curpages < 10 &&
> > |                                rel->rd_rel->relpages == 0 &&
> > |                                !rel->rd_rel->relhassubclass &&
> > |                                rel->rd_rel->relkind != RELKIND_INDEX)
> > |                                curpages = 10;
> 
> So I'm sure you read the comment above that, too.

> One idea is to say that relpages = reltuples = 0 is only the state that
> prevails for a freshly-created table, and that VACUUM or ANALYZE should
> always set relpages to at least 1 even if the physical size is zero.

> Dunno if that would confuse people.

What about adding && rel->rd_rel->reltuples==0, and make VACUUM/ANALYZE instead
set only reltuples=1, since that's already done at costsize.c: clamp_row_est()
and therefor no additional confusion?

Justin


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PERFORM] overestimate on empty table
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PERFORM] overestimate on empty table