Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usagewhen also referencing entire json document
От
Andres Freund
Тема
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usagewhen also referencing entire json document
Дата
Msg-id
20171008211311.vrzrbelmiwvinka6@alap3.anarazel.de
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usage when alsoreferencing entire json document Lucas Fairchild-Madar <lucas.madar@gmail.com>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usage when also referencing entire json document Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usagewhen also referencing entire json document Lucas Fairchild-Madar <lucas.madar@gmail.com>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usage when also referencing entire json document Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usagewhen also referencing entire json document Lucas Fairchild-Madar <lucas.madar@gmail.com>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usage when also referencing entire json document Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usagewhen also referencing entire json document Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usage when also referencing entire json document Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usagewhen also referencing entire json document Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usage when also referencing entire json document Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usagewhen also referencing entire json document Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usage when also referencing entire json document Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usagewhen also referencing entire json document Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usagewhen also referencing entire json document Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usage when also referencing entire json document Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usagewhen also referencing entire json document Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usagewhen also referencing entire json document Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usagewhen also referencing entire json document Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usage when also referencing entire json document Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usagewhen also referencing entire json document Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usage when also referencing entire json document Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usagewhen also referencing entire json document Lucas Fairchild-Madar <lucas.madar@gmail.com>
Re: [BUGS] json(b)_array_elements use causes very large memory usage when also referencing entire json document Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On 2017-10-08 16:27:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund writes: > > On 2017-10-06 21:08:43 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > >> I'm kinda tempted to put this, after a bit more testing, into v10. > > > Any opinions on that? > > I think it's fine to put it in HEAD. I would not risk back-patching > into v10. Now that we fixed the new leak, v10 is on par with the last > umpteen years worth of tSRF behavior, and we've not had very many > complaints about that. WFM. Was only thinking about it, because it'd give the OP a chance to upgrade to a supported release and get rid of the behaviour. But given he's essentially hitting O(n^2) runtime even aftre that, just rewriting the query is the saner option anyway... Will make it so. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата: