Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() forlarger connection counts

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Andres Freund
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() forlarger connection counts
Дата
Msg-id
20170925180740.qoxus7jfwnegpqqh@alap3.anarazel.de
Ответ на
[HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connectioncounts (Rady, Doug)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connectioncounts "Rady, Doug" <radydoug@amazon.com>
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() forlarger connection counts Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() forlarger connection counts "Rady, Doug" <radydoug@amazon.com>
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() forlarger connection counts Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() forlarger connection counts Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() forlarger connection counts "Rady, Doug" <radydoug@amazon.com>
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() forlarger connection counts Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() forlarger connection counts Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() forlarger connection counts Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() forlarger connection counts Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() forlarger connection counts "Rady, Doug" <radydoug@amazon.com> 
On 2017-09-25 18:01:40 +0000, Rady, Doug wrote:
> This patch enables building pgbench to use ppoll() instead of select()
> to allow for more than (FD_SETSIZE - 10) connections.  As implemented,
> when using ppoll(), the only connection limitation is system resources.

Hm, is there any need of using ppoll over poll?  IIRC it's a good bit
more common and there's, also iirc, a number of platforms with buggy
ppoll implementations.


Greetings,

Andres Freund


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
Предыдущее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
FAQ