Re: [HACKERS] Red-black trees: why would anyone want preorder orpostorder traversal?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Aleksander Alekseev
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Red-black trees: why would anyone want preorder orpostorder traversal?
Дата
Msg-id 20170911092416.GA31385@e733.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] Red-black trees: why would anyone want preorder or postorder traversal?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi Tom,

> In short, therefore, I propose we rip out the DirectWalk and InvertedWalk
> options along with their support code, and then drop the portions of
> test_rbtree that are needed to exercise them.  Any objections?

Doesn't sound like something that will be used any time soon. When and
if it will happen nothing prevents us from adding this code back. So
it's +1.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage
Следующее
От: Konstantin Knizhnik
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization