* Christoph Moench-Tegeder (cmt@burggraben.net) wrote:
> ## Ron Johnson (ron.l.johnson@cox.net):
>
> > How is this done in v8.4? (I tried adding "date; rsync ..." but pg
> > didn't like that *at all*.)
>
> There's a DEBUG1-level log message on successful archive_command
> completion - that would give you a lot of other low-prio log
> messages wich you probably don't care about.
> I'd put a wrapper around your rsync (a short shell script
> would be sufficient) in the lines of rsync ... && logger "done",
> that way you'd get the information via syslog.
> On the other hand, do you really need the details about each WAL
> segment? Since 9.4 there's pg_stat_wal_archiver... You're really
> making your job harder than it needs to be with that ancient
> PostgreSQL...
Worse, such scripts run the serious risk of losing WAL if a crash
happens because nothing is ensuring that the WAL has been sync'd to disk
before returning from the archive_command.
Most of the existing tools for dealing with WAL archival (pgbackrest,
barman and WAL-E, at least) already log successful and unsuccessful
archive command runs. I'm pretty sure barman supports back to 8.4 and I
know pgbackrest does.
Thanks!
Stephen