Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recentlyadded wait events

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recentlyadded wait events
Дата
Msg-id 20170809192556.koklj3dremkc5bfb@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recently added wait events  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recentlyadded wait events  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> I think generating whatever we can from a single authoritative file
> is indeed a good idea.

Yay.

> But I had the impression that people also wanted to enforce a rule
> about "only one use of each wait event name", which'd require a
> checker script, no?  (I'm not really convinced that we need such a
> rule, fwiw.)

I'm not convinced of that, either.  Of the possible problems in the
area, that seems the lesser one.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dean Rasheed
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] dubious error message from partition.c
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions