[HACKERS] Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is*still* broken)
| От | Noah Misch |
|---|---|
| Тема | [HACKERS] Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is*still* broken) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20170710144730.GA2189404@rfd.leadboat.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:08:53AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes: > > I recommend pushing your patch so the August back-branch releases have it. > > One can see by inspection that your patch has negligible effect on systems > > healthy today. I have a reasonable suspicion it will help some systems. If > > others remain broken after this, that fact will provide a useful clue. > > Okay, so that leaves us with a decision to make: push it into beta2, or > wait till after wrap? I find it pretty scary to push a patch with > portability implications so soon before wrap, but a quick look at the > buildfarm suggests we'd get runs from 3 or 4 Windows members before the > wrap, if I do it quickly. If we wait, then it will hit the field in > production releases with reasonable buildfarm testing but little more. > That's also pretty scary. > > On balance I'm tempted to push it now for beta2, but it's a close call. > Thoughts? Pushing now for beta2 sounds good.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: