On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 09:24:21AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > I was not clear. I was not saying there can be only one extra WAL file.
> > I am saying the "Latest checkpoint location" should be one WAL file
> > farther on the master. I think the big problem is that we need a full
> > replay of that WAL file, not just having it one less than the master.
> >
>
> If the user has properly shutdown, then that last file should only
> have checkpoint record, is it safe to proceed with upgrade without
> actually copying that file?
Yes, but how do we know they processed all the records in the
second-to-last WAL file (in WAL shipping mode).
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +