Hi,
Author: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@iki.fi>
Branch: master Release: REL9_5_BR [b2a5545bd] 2015-04-13 16:53:49 +0300
Branch: REL9_4_STABLE Release: REL9_4_2 [d72792d02] 2015-04-13 17:22:21 +0300
Branch: REL9_3_STABLE Release: REL9_3_7 [a800267e4] 2015-04-13 17:22:35 +0300
Branch: REL9_2_STABLE Release: REL9_2_11 [cc2939f44] 2015-04-13 17:26:59 +0300
Branch: REL9_1_STABLE Release: REL9_1_16 [ad2925e20] 2015-04-13 17:26:49 +0300
Branch: REL9_0_STABLE Release: REL9_0_20 [5b6938186] 2015-04-13 17:26:35 +0300
Don't archive bogus recycled or preallocated files after timeline switch.
Moved xlog file deletion from RemoveOldXlogFiles() into its own
RemoveXlogFile() routine, because it introduced a new function also
deleting/recycling segments.
It did so moving
+ /* Needn't recheck that slot on future iterations */
+ endlogSegNo++;
into the new routine. But it's useless there, because it's just a stack
variable, which is going to be freshly computed with
+ XLByteToPrevSeg(endptr, endlogSegNo);
on the next call.
That logic was introduced in
commit 61b861421b0b849a0dffe36238b8e504624831c1
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2005-04-15 18:48:10 +0000
Modify MoveOfflineLogs/InstallXLogFileSegment to avoid O(N^2) behavior when recycling a large number of xlog
segmentsduring checkpoint. The former behavior searched from the same start point each time, requiring
O(checkpoint_segments^2)stat() calls to relocate all the segments. Instead keep track of where we stopped last time
through.
but was neutered by the commit above.
We've not heard any complaints about this afaik, but it's not something
that's easily diagnosable as being a problem. Therefore I suspect we
should fix and backpatch this?
Heikki?
Greetings,
Andres Freund