Re: [HACKERS] Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Meskes
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware?
Дата
Msg-id 20170607141702.vfyriqgq2pwgzoqi@feivel
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware?  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware?  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 03:45:23AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> Could you also apply it to past versions if you don't mind?  The oldest supported version 9.2 is already
thread-aware.

Done.

My standard workflow is to wait a couple days to see if everything works nicely before backporting. Obviously this
doesn'tmake any sense for a doc patch, sigh.
 

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken)
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Use of non-restart-safe storage by temp_tablespaces