Re: [HACKERS] walsender & parallelism

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: [HACKERS] walsender & parallelism
Дата
Msg-id 20170424232559.j5zuna3rpzksj26l@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] walsender & parallelism  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] walsender & parallelism
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2017-04-24 07:31:18 +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> The previous coding tried to run the unknown string throur lexer which
> could fail for some valid SQL statements as the replication command
> parser is too simple to handle all the complexities of SQL language.
> 
> Instead just fall back to SQL parser on any unknown command.
> 
> Also remove SHOW command handling from walsender as it's handled by the
> simple query code path.

This break SHOW var; over the plain replication connections though
(which was quite intentionally supported), so I don't think that's ok?


I don't like much how SHOW and walsender understanding SQL statements
turned out, I think code like
                if (am_walsender)                {                    if (!exec_replication_command(query_string))
                 exec_simple_query(query_string);                }                else
exec_simple_query(query_string);

shows some of the issues here.


> Checks the SQL over walsender interface by running the standard set of
> regression tests against it.

I like that approach a lot.


> New alternative output for largeobject test has been added as the
> replication connection does not support fastpath function calls.

I think just supporting fastpath over the replication protocol is less
work than maintaining the alternative file.


> --- a/src/Makefile.global.in
> +++ b/src/Makefile.global.in
> @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ BZIP2    = bzip2
>  # Testing
>  
>  check: temp-install
> +check-walsender-sql: temp-install

This doesn't strike me as something that should go into
a/src/Makefile.global.in - I'd rather put it in
b/src/test/regress/GNUmakefile.  check is in .global because it's used
in a lot of different makefiles, but that's not true for this target, right?



Greetings,

Andres Freund



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Petr Jelinek
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start