At Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:33:29 +0200, Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com> wrote in
<ed73a706-9e15-f137-2d55-f05361f2de9a@2ndquadrant.com>
> > Commit has been moved from after to before of the lock section.
> > This causes potential race condition. (As the same as the
> > potential dead-lock, I'm not sure it can cause realistic problem,
> > though..) Isn't it better to be after the lock section?
> >
>
> We just read catalogs so there should not be locking issues.
Some other process may modify it then go to there. With a kind of
priority inversion, the process may modify the data on the memory
*before* we modify it. Of course this is rather unrealistic,
though.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center