On 2017-03-14 23:10:25 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 3/14/17 19:40, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Any idea why we introduce __ stuff?
>
> Because the symbols start with an underscore:
>
> /* Define to 1 if your compiler understands _Static_assert. */
> #undef HAVE__STATIC_ASSERT
Oh, I guess that makes some sense. But we do so very inconsistently,
given we only keep the leading underscores not the trailing ones (see
HAVE__VA_ARGS, HAVE_FUNCNAME__FUNC).
> But we don't need to introduce underscores that are not there.
Indeed. Don't want to repost for just this, but consider it adapted
(and moved as requested by Tom).
- Andres