Peter,
* Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> On 3/8/17 04:11, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> > The header for this table is "list of relations", so type gets
> > associated with relations indicated type of relation. btree: gin as a
> > type of relation doesn't sound really great. Instead we might want to
> > add another column "access method" and specify the access method used
> > for that relation.
>
> I like that.
When it will be NULL for all of the regular tables..?
I'd rather have the one Type column that just included the access method
when there is one to include.
Thanks!
Stephen