Re: [HACKERS] rename pg_log directory?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] rename pg_log directory?
Дата
Msg-id 20170228030115.GG11339@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] rename pg_log directory?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] rename pg_log directory?  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 09:51:26AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > How about changing the default for log_directory from 'pg_log' to, say,
> > 'log'?
> 
> > We have been emphasizing that the prefix "pg_" is for things reserved to
> > PostgreSQL, whereas the pg_log directory is entirely an arbitrary
> > user-space name.  Also, with a different name, the directory would stand
> > out more between all the other pg_* directories in the data directory.
> 
> No objection to the basic point, but "log" seems perhaps a little too
> generic to me.  Would something like "server_log" be better?

"activity_log"?  I like the idea of a rename.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches