Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster
Дата
Msg-id 20170222135838.GL9812@tamriel.snowman.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Tom, all,

* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> While I'm generally not one to vote for dropping backwards-compatibility
> features, I have to say that I find #4 the most attractive of these
> options.  It would result in getting rid of boatloads of under-tested
> code, whereas #2 would really just add more, and #3 at best maintains
> the status quo complexity-wise.

+1.

Thanks!

Stephen

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster
Следующее
От: Thom Brown
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Hash support for grouping sets