Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning
Дата
Msg-id 20170220203320.GB2672@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 02:37:44PM +0530, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > On 15 February 2017 at 15:46, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> It leaves me asking what else is missing.
> >>
> >> There is certainly a lot of room for improvement here but I don't
> >> understand your persistent negativity about what's been done thus far.
> >> I think it's pretty clearly a huge step forward, and I think Amit
> >> deserves a ton of credit for making it happen.  The improvements in
> >> bulk loading performance alone are stupendous.  You apparently have
> >> the idea that somebody could have written an even larger patch that
> >> solved even more problems at once, but this was already a really big
> >> patch, and IMHO quite a good one.
> >
> > Please explain these personal comments against me.
> 
> Several of your emails, including your first post to this thread,
> seemed to me to be quite negative about the state of this feature.  I
> don't think that's warranted, though perhaps I am misreading your
> tone, as I have been known to do.  I also don't think that expressing
> the opinion that the feature is better than you're giving it credit
> for is a personal comment against you.  Where exactly do you see a
> personal comment against you in what I wrote?

I have to admit my reaction was similar to Simon's, meaning that the
lack of docs is a problem, and that the limitations are kind of a
surprise, and I wonder what other surprises there are.

I am thinking this is a result of small teams, often from the same
company, working on a features in isolation and then making them public.
It is often not clear what decisions were made and why.  The idea that
unique indexes on a parent table can't guarantee uniqueness across child
tables is both a surprise, and obvious once stated.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning
Следующее
От: nuko yokohama
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] SUBSCRIPTION command hangs up, segfault occurs in the server processand to cancel the execution.