Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster
Дата
Msg-id 20170220110456.2jupmfhxlizykmmc@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 2017-02-20 11:58:12 +0100, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> That being said, I did wonder myself if we should just deprecate float
> timestamps as well.

I think we need a proper deprecation period for that, given that the
conversion away will be painful for pg_upgrade using people with big
clusters.  So I think we should fix this regardless... :(

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Petr Jelinek
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster
Следующее
От: Dave Page
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] pg_ls_waldir() & pg_ls_logdir()