* Andres Freund (andres@anarazel.de) wrote:
> On 2017-02-09 19:19:21 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > I'd love to nuke pg_shadow and all the other
> > not-really-maintained backwards-compat things from when roles were
> > added too.
>
> Not sure if it's worth the work to rip out and such, but I'm mildly
> supportive of this one too. Depends a bit on what all the other things
> are ;)
Reviewing 7762619e95272974f90a38d8d85aafbe0e94add5 where roles were
added, I find:
pg_user - use pg_roles instead, which actually includes all of the role attributes, unlike pg_user
pg_shadow - use pg_authid instead, which, again, actually includes all of the role attributes, unlike
pg_shadow.
pg_group - use pg_auth_members instead, which includes the info about the admin option and the grantor
I don't think we should remove things like CREATE USER, that's a
perfectly reasonable and maintained interface, unlike the above views,
which missed out on things like the 'createrole' role attribute.
Thanks!
Stephen