On 2017-01-26 12:24:44 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > Currently a waiting standby doesn't allow interrupts.
> >
> > Patch implements that.
> >
> > Barring objection, patching today with backpatches.
>
> "today" is a little quick, but the patch looks fine. I doubt anyone's
> going to screech too loud about adding a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() call.
I don't quite get asking for agreement, and then not waiting as
suggested. I'm personally fine with going with a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS
for now, but I think it'd better to replace it with a latch.
Andres