Re: [HACKERS] Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (wasChanged SRF in targetlist handling)
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (wasChanged SRF in targetlist handling) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20170118214702.54b2mdbxce5piwv5@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (was Changed SRF in targetlist handling) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2017-01-18 15:24:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > Yea, have something lying around. Let me push it then when I get back from lunch? > > Sure, no sweat. Pushed. Yay! There's one sgml comment you'd added: "Furthermore, nested set-returning functions did not work at all." I'm not quite sure what you're referring to there - it was previously allowed to have one set argument to an SRF: postgres[28758][1]=# SELECT generate_series(1,generate_series(1,5)); ┌─────────────────┐ │ generate_series │ ├─────────────────┤ │ 1 │ │ 1 │ │ 2 │ │ 1 │ │ 2 │ │ 3 │ Am I misunderstanding what you meant? I left it in what I committed, but we probably should clear up the language there. Working on rebasing the cleanup patch now. Interested in reviewing that? Otherwise I think I'll just push the rebased version of what I'd posted before, after making another pass through it. - Andres
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: