Re: [GENERAL] checkpoint clarifications needed

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: [GENERAL] checkpoint clarifications needed
Дата
Msg-id 20170109223132.sg6lowfv7crhp7ca@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] checkpoint clarifications needed  (Tom DalPozzo <t.dalpozzo@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Tom DalPozzo wrote:

> Hi,
> so let's suppose that the WAL is:
> LSN 10: start transaction 123
> LSN 11: update tuple 100
>    checkpoint position here (not a record but just for understanding)
> LSN 12: update tuple 100
> LSN 13: update tuple 100
> LSN 14: checkpoint record ( postion=11)
> LSN 15: update tuple 100
> and that the system crashes now, before ending to write all the
> transaction's recs to the WAL  (other updates and commit record missing).
>
> At the replay, starting from LSN 12, the entire page we had at LSN 11 is
> written to the disk, though carrying inconsistent data.
> Then we can even replay up to the end of WAL but always getting
> inconsistent data.
> BUT, you say, as the tuple is not commited in the WAL, only the old version
> of the tuple will be visible? Right?

Yes -- all the updated tuples are invisible because the commit record
for transaction 123 does not appear in wal.  A future VACUUM will remove
all those tuples.  Note that precisely for this reason, the original
version of the tuple had not been removed yet.

--
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom DalPozzo
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] checkpoint clarifications needed
Следующее
От: Tom DalPozzo
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] checkpoint clarifications needed