On 2016-12-16 12:33:11 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> >> On 2016-12-16 11:41:49 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > Thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> Hearing no objections, I've gone ahead and committed this. If that
> >>> makes somebody really unhappy I can revert it, but I am betting that
> >>> the real story is that nobody cares about preserving T_ID().
> >>
> >> I don't care about T_ID, but I do care about breaking extensions using
> >> lwlocks like for the 3rd release in a row or such. This is getting a
> >> bit ridiculous.
> >
> > Hmm, I hadn't thought about that. :-)
>
> Err, that was supposed to be :-( As in sad, not happy.
Both work for me ;)