Re: [HACKERS] exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Trackingwait event for latches)
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Trackingwait event for latches) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20161212162632.7l5hct73jmoxqppd@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Trackingwait event for latches) (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Trackingwait event for latches)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > So, one of the problems in this patch as committed is that for any > process that doesn't show up in pg_stat_activity, there's no way to > see the wait event information. That sucks. I think there are > basically two ways to fix this: > > 1. Show all processes that have a PGPROC in pg_stat_activity, > including auxiliary processes and whatnot, and use some new field in > pg_stat_activity to indicate the process type. > > 2. Add a second view, say pg_stat_system_activity, to show the > processes that don't appear in pg_stat_activity. A bunch of columns > could likely be omitted, but there would be some duplication, too. > > Preferences? I vote 1. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: