[BUGS] BUG #14460: ecpg dynamic describe data types incorrect

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От gary.cowell@gmail.com
Тема [BUGS] BUG #14460: ecpg dynamic describe data types incorrect
Дата
Msg-id 20161212153603.14901.48046@wrigleys.postgresql.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [BUGS] BUG #14460: ecpg dynamic describe data types incorrect  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
Список pgsql-bugs
The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference:      14460
Logged by:          gary surname
Email address:      gary.cowell@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.5.5
Operating system:   Red Hat Linux 7
Description:

If you have a table:

gc=> \d tajsplne
          Table "public.tajsplne"
 Column |         Type          | Modifiers
--------+-----------------------+-----------
 a      | character varying(20) |
 b      | text                  |
 c      | character(10)         |
 d      | integer               |


four different data types.

Insert a row:

gc=> insert into tajsplne values ('var','text','char',1);
INSERT 0 1
gc=> \q

Then run an ecpg program to select and describe the data, the data types
come back as:

a = var (type: 1)
b = text (type: 1)
c = char       (type: 1)
d = 1 (type: 5)

I.e. the sqlda data types for the CHAR , VARCHAR and TEXT columns, is all
type 1.


According to ecpgtype.h

enum ECPGttype
{
        ECPGt_char = 1, ECPGt_unsigned_char, ECPGt_short,
ECPGt_unsigned_short,
        ECPGt_int, ECPGt_unsigned_int, ECPGt_long, ECPGt_unsigned_long,
        ECPGt_long_long, ECPGt_unsigned_long_long,
        ECPGt_bool,
        ECPGt_float, ECPGt_double,
        ECPGt_varchar, ECPGt_varchar2,
        ECPGt_numeric,                          /* this is a decimal that
stores its digits in
                                                                 * a
malloced array */
        ECPGt_decimal,                          /* this is a decimal that
stores its digits in
                                                                 * a fixed
array */
        ECPGt_date,
        ECPGt_timestamp,
        ECPGt_interval,
        ECPGt_array,
        ECPGt_struct,
        ECPGt_union,
        ECPGt_descriptor,                       /* sql descriptor, no C
variable */
        ECPGt_char_variable,
        ECPGt_const,                            /* a constant is needed
sometimes */
        ECPGt_EOIT,                                     /* End of insert
types. */
        ECPGt_EORT,                                     /* End of result
types. */
        ECPGt_NO_INDICATOR,                     /* no indicator */
        ECPGt_string,                           /* trimmed (char *) type
*/
        ECPGt_sqlda                                     /* C struct
descriptor */
};

the varchar at least should be type 14, yes?  Though not much clue what the
TEXT type should be.

Have I a misunderstanding, or is this a bug?

Thanks


--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] Re: 9.5 / Re: base_yylex undefined in src/interface/ecpg/preproc/parser.c
Следующее
От: nwilson5@gmail.com
Дата:
Сообщение: [BUGS] BUG #14461: ERROR: index returned tuples in wrong order