Re: Mail thread references in commits

* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > This:
>
> >> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20161128182113.6527.58926@wrigleys.postgresql.org
> >> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+renyUEE29=X01JXdz8_TQvo6n9=2XoEBBRnQ8rkLyr+kjPxQ@mail.gmail.com
>
> > still looks better than:
>
> >> Discussion: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20161128182113.6527.58926@wrigleys.postgresql.org
> >> Discussion:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+renyUEE29=X01JXdz8_TQvo6n9=2XoEBBRnQ8rkLyr+kjPxQ@mail.gmail.com
>
> Really?  Somebody expressed the opposite preference upthread, and I agree.
> "postgr.es" looks, at best, unofficial.

I find that to be a particularly compelling point.

Also, while it's a pretty minor point, using the canonical form also
avoids an unnecessary redirect.

Thanks!

Stephen