Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
| От | Karl O. Pinc |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20161117094334.62d873e9@slate.meme.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function ("Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Gilles, On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 02:04:59 -0500 "Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com> wrote: > Attached is a patch to be applied on top of your v10 patch > which does basic fixup to logfile_writename(). I'm looking at the v13 patch and don't see a change I submitted with a patch to v10. You wrote: snprintf(tempfn, sizeof(tempfn), "%s", CURRENT_LOG_FILENAME); strcat(tempfn, ".tmp"); I patched to: snprintf(tempfn, sizeof(tempfn), "%s.tmp", CURRENT_LOG_FILENAME); As long as you're doing a snprintf() there's no point in "risking" a buffer overflow by a subsequent strcat(). (Not that you're likely to ever get a buffer overflow.) And why make two calls instead of 1? That's what's in my head. Regards, Karl <kop@meme.com> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward." -- Robert A. Heinlein
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: