Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Karl O. Pinc
Тема Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
Дата
Msg-id 20161117094334.62d873e9@slate.meme.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function  ("Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi Gilles,

On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 02:04:59 -0500
"Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com> wrote:

> Attached is a patch to be applied on top of your v10 patch
> which does basic fixup to logfile_writename().

I'm looking at the v13 patch and don't see a change I submitted
with a patch to v10.  You wrote:
   snprintf(tempfn, sizeof(tempfn), "%s",                       CURRENT_LOG_FILENAME);   strcat(tempfn, ".tmp");

I patched to:
   snprintf(tempfn, sizeof(tempfn), "%s.tmp",                       CURRENT_LOG_FILENAME);

As long as you're doing a snprintf() there's no point
in "risking" a buffer overflow by a subsequent strcat().
(Not that you're likely to ever get a buffer overflow.)
And why make two calls instead of 1?  That's what's
in my head.

Regards,

Karl <kop@meme.com>
Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."                -- Robert A. Heinlein



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Parallel execution and prepared statements
Следующее
От: Kohei KaiGai
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Use of pg_proc.probin is legal?